Files
esphome/tests/component_tests/emontx/test_sensor_defaults.py
T
Frédéric MetrichGitHubpre-commit-ci-lite[bot] <117423508+pre-commit-ci-lite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>Claude Sonnet 4.6
7957808f00 [emontx] Fix sensor state_class defaults not being applied correctly (#17610)
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci-lite[bot] <117423508+pre-commit-ci-lite[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-21 09:57:58 -05:00

101 lines
3.7 KiB
Python

"""Tests for emontx sensor tag defaults."""
import pytest
from esphome.components import sensor
from esphome.components.emontx.sensor import CONFIG_SCHEMA, apply_tag_defaults
from esphome.const import (
CONF_ACCURACY_DECIMALS,
CONF_STATE_CLASS,
STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT,
STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING,
)
def _resolve_via_config_schema(tag: str) -> dict:
"""Run a minimal config through the real CONFIG_SCHEMA pipeline, the
same path a user's YAML goes through."""
return CONFIG_SCHEMA(
{"tag_name": tag, "emontx_id": "my_emontx", "name": f"{tag} sensor"}
)
def test_config_schema_applies_tag_default_state_class():
"""If sensor_schema(state_class=...) is reintroduced, the schema-level
default wins over apply_tag_defaults' per-prefix value, and E1 would
resolve to measurement instead of total_increasing. Driving the real
CONFIG_SCHEMA (not just apply_tag_defaults) catches that, since
sensor_schema() runs before apply_tag_defaults in the cv.All() chain.
"""
result = _resolve_via_config_schema("E1")
assert result[CONF_STATE_CLASS] == sensor.validate_state_class(
STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING
)
def test_config_schema_applies_tag_default_accuracy_decimals():
"""Same root cause as the state_class regression: reintroducing
sensor_schema(accuracy_decimals=...) would make V1 resolve to the
schema-level default instead of the prefix-specific value of 2.
"""
result = _resolve_via_config_schema("V1")
assert result[CONF_ACCURACY_DECIMALS] == 2
def _make_config(tag: str) -> dict:
"""Minimal config dict with only tag_name set — no overrides."""
return {"tag_name": tag}
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("tag", "expected_state_class", "expected_decimals"),
[
# Known numeric-index prefixes
("E1", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 0),
("E12", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 0),
("P1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 0),
("V1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 2),
("I1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 2),
("T1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 2),
# Known patterns
("PULSE1", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 0),
("PULSE12", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 0),
("PF1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 2),
# Unknown / free-form tags fall back to generic defaults
("CUSTOM1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 0),
("X", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 0),
],
)
def test_apply_tag_defaults(tag, expected_state_class, expected_decimals):
"""apply_tag_defaults must inject the correct state_class and accuracy_decimals
for each tag type when no user overrides are present."""
config = _make_config(tag)
result = apply_tag_defaults(config)
assert result[CONF_STATE_CLASS] == sensor.validate_state_class(expected_state_class)
assert result[CONF_ACCURACY_DECIMALS] == expected_decimals
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
("tag", "user_state_class", "user_decimals"),
[
# User overrides must not be clobbered by defaults
("E1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 3),
("PULSE1", STATE_CLASS_MEASUREMENT, 1),
("V1", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 0),
("CUSTOM1", STATE_CLASS_TOTAL_INCREASING, 4),
],
)
def test_apply_tag_defaults_respects_user_overrides(
tag, user_state_class, user_decimals
):
"""apply_tag_defaults must not overwrite values already set by the user."""
config = _make_config(tag)
config[CONF_STATE_CLASS] = sensor.validate_state_class(user_state_class)
config[CONF_ACCURACY_DECIMALS] = user_decimals
result = apply_tag_defaults(config)
assert result[CONF_STATE_CLASS] == sensor.validate_state_class(user_state_class)
assert result[CONF_ACCURACY_DECIMALS] == user_decimals