Files
2026-04-23 06:47:16 -05:00

220 lines
8.0 KiB
JavaScript

const {
BOT_COMMENT_MARKER,
CODEOWNERS_MARKER,
TOO_BIG_MARKER,
DEPRECATED_COMPONENT_MARKER,
ORG_FORK_MARKER
} = require('./constants');
// Generate review messages
function generateReviewMessages(finalLabels, originalLabelCount, deprecatedInfo, prFiles, totalAdditions, totalDeletions, prAuthor, MAX_LABELS, TOO_BIG_THRESHOLD) {
const messages = [];
// Deprecated component message
if (finalLabels.includes('deprecated-component') && deprecatedInfo && deprecatedInfo.length > 0) {
let message = `${DEPRECATED_COMPONENT_MARKER}\n### ⚠️ Deprecated Component\n\n`;
message += `Hey there @${prAuthor},\n`;
message += `This PR modifies one or more deprecated components. Please be aware:\n\n`;
for (const info of deprecatedInfo) {
message += `#### Component: \`${info.component}\`\n`;
message += `${info.message}\n\n`;
}
message += `Consider migrating to the recommended alternative if applicable.`;
messages.push(message);
}
// Too big message
if (finalLabels.includes('too-big')) {
const testAdditions = prFiles
.filter(file => file.filename.startsWith('tests/'))
.reduce((sum, file) => sum + (file.additions || 0), 0);
const testDeletions = prFiles
.filter(file => file.filename.startsWith('tests/'))
.reduce((sum, file) => sum + (file.deletions || 0), 0);
const nonTestChanges = (totalAdditions - testAdditions) - (totalDeletions - testDeletions);
const tooManyLabels = originalLabelCount > MAX_LABELS;
const tooManyChanges = nonTestChanges > TOO_BIG_THRESHOLD;
let message = `${TOO_BIG_MARKER}\n### 📦 Pull Request Size\n\n`;
message +=
`Hey @${prAuthor}, thanks for the contribution! Just a heads up, ` +
`this PR is on the large side `;
if (tooManyLabels && tooManyChanges) {
message +=
`(${nonTestChanges} line changes excluding tests, across ` +
`${originalLabelCount} different components/areas)`;
} else if (tooManyLabels) {
message +=
`(it touches ${originalLabelCount} different components/areas)`;
} else {
message += `(${nonTestChanges} line changes excluding tests)`;
}
message += `, which makes it harder for maintainers to review.\n\n`;
message +=
`Smaller, focused PRs tend to be reviewed much faster since they ` +
`fit into the short gaps between other maintainer work; large ones ` +
`often have to wait for a rare long uninterrupted block of time. ` +
`If you can break this up into smaller pieces that can be reviewed ` +
`independently, it will almost certainly land faster overall.\n\n`;
message +=
`Before putting more time in, it's also worth popping into ` +
`\`#devs\` on [Discord](https://esphome.io/chat) so we can help ` +
`you scope things and flag anything already in flight.\n\n`;
message +=
`For more details (including how to split the work up), see: ` +
`https://developers.esphome.io/contributing/submitting-your-work/` +
`#how-to-approach-large-submissions`;
messages.push(message);
}
// CODEOWNERS message
if (finalLabels.includes('needs-codeowners')) {
const message = `${CODEOWNERS_MARKER}\n### 👥 Code Ownership\n\n` +
`Hey there @${prAuthor},\n` +
`Thanks for submitting this pull request! Can you add yourself as a codeowner for this integration? ` +
`This way we can notify you if a bug report for this integration is reported.\n\n` +
`In \`__init__.py\` of the integration, please add:\n\n` +
`\`\`\`python\nCODEOWNERS = ["@${prAuthor}"]\n\`\`\`\n\n` +
`And run \`script/build_codeowners.py\``;
messages.push(message);
}
return messages;
}
// Handle reviews
async function handleReviews(github, context, finalLabels, originalLabelCount, deprecatedInfo, prFiles, totalAdditions, totalDeletions, MAX_LABELS, TOO_BIG_THRESHOLD) {
const { owner, repo } = context.repo;
const pr_number = context.issue.number;
const prAuthor = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
const reviewMessages = generateReviewMessages(finalLabels, originalLabelCount, deprecatedInfo, prFiles, totalAdditions, totalDeletions, prAuthor, MAX_LABELS, TOO_BIG_THRESHOLD);
const hasReviewableLabels = finalLabels.some(label =>
['too-big', 'needs-codeowners', 'deprecated-component'].includes(label)
);
const { data: reviews } = await github.rest.pulls.listReviews({
owner,
repo,
pull_number: pr_number
});
const botReviews = reviews.filter(review =>
review.user.type === 'Bot' &&
review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED' &&
review.body && review.body.includes(BOT_COMMENT_MARKER)
);
if (hasReviewableLabels) {
const reviewBody = `${BOT_COMMENT_MARKER}\n\n${reviewMessages.join('\n\n---\n\n')}`;
if (botReviews.length > 0) {
// Update existing review
await github.rest.pulls.updateReview({
owner,
repo,
pull_number: pr_number,
review_id: botReviews[0].id,
body: reviewBody
});
console.log('Updated existing bot review');
} else {
// Create new review
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
owner,
repo,
pull_number: pr_number,
body: reviewBody,
event: 'REQUEST_CHANGES'
});
console.log('Created new bot review');
}
} else if (botReviews.length > 0) {
// Dismiss existing reviews
for (const review of botReviews) {
try {
await github.rest.pulls.dismissReview({
owner,
repo,
pull_number: pr_number,
review_id: review.id,
message: 'Review dismissed: All requirements have been met'
});
console.log(`Dismissed bot review ${review.id}`);
} catch (error) {
console.log(`Failed to dismiss review ${review.id}:`, error.message);
}
}
}
}
// Handle maintainer access warning comment
async function handleMaintainerAccessComment(github, context, maintainerAccess) {
if (!maintainerAccess) {
return;
}
const { owner, repo } = context.repo;
const pr_number = context.issue.number;
const prAuthor = context.payload.pull_request.user.login;
// Check if we already posted the warning (iterate pages to exit early)
let existingComment;
for await (const { data: comments } of github.paginate.iterator(
github.rest.issues.listComments,
{ owner, repo, issue_number: pr_number }
)) {
existingComment = comments.find(comment =>
comment.user.type === 'Bot' &&
comment.body && comment.body.includes(ORG_FORK_MARKER)
);
if (existingComment) {
break;
}
}
if (existingComment) {
console.log('Maintainer access warning comment already exists, skipping');
return;
}
let body;
if (maintainerAccess.isOrgFork) {
body = `${ORG_FORK_MARKER}\n### ⚠️ Organization Fork Detected\n\n` +
`Hey there @${prAuthor},\n` +
`It looks like this PR was submitted from a fork owned by the **${maintainerAccess.orgName}** organization. ` +
`GitHub does not allow maintainers to push changes to pull request branches when the fork is owned by an organization. ` +
`This means we won't be able to make small adjustments or fixups to your PR directly.\n\n` +
`To allow maintainer collaboration, please re-submit this PR from a personal fork instead.\n\n` +
`See: [Setting up the local repository](https://developers.esphome.io/contributing/development-environment/?h=org#set-up-the-local-repository) for more details.`;
} else {
body = `${ORG_FORK_MARKER}\n### ⚠️ Maintainer Access Disabled\n\n` +
`Hey there @${prAuthor},\n` +
`It looks like this PR does not have the "Allow edits from maintainers" option enabled. ` +
`This means we won't be able to make small adjustments or fixups to your PR directly.\n\n` +
`Please enable this option in the PR sidebar to allow maintainer collaboration.`;
}
await github.rest.issues.createComment({
owner,
repo,
issue_number: pr_number,
body
});
console.log('Created maintainer access warning comment');
}
module.exports = {
handleReviews,
handleMaintainerAccessComment
};