Files
J. Nick Koston bcac422e9e [cli] Address self-review on --prebuilt-dir
- CORE.firmware_bin priority is now platform-aware: RP2040 + libretiny
  prefer firmware.uf2 over firmware.bin (picotool / ltchiptool need the
  UF2 header for address/family info); ESP* prefer firmware.bin. The
  prior code returned .bin first for all platforms, which would have
  silently flashed the wrong artifact on RP2040 if a hand-staged dir
  shipped both files. New tests guard both directions.

- _rp2040_serial_reset_to_bootsel: check picotool exists *before*
  triggering the 1200bps touch. If picotool is missing, the touch
  would have left the device stranded in BOOTSEL with nothing able to
  flash it; with this order the device stays on the old firmware and
  can be retried.

- upload_using_ltchiptool: error message now mentions both firmware.uf2
  and firmware.bin since CORE.firmware_bin resolves either.

- prepare_platform_for_upload: return type tightened to int (capture_stdout
  is hardcoded False; assert the run helper returns int so a future caller
  that flips capture_stdout fails loudly instead of silently treating a
  string as success). Caller in __main__.py is now a one-liner.

- _load_idedata: narrative comment in the prebuilt branch shortened.
  _resolve_prebuilt_idedata_paths docstring now notes the
  POSIX-absolute-on-Windows quirk ("/foo/bar" is rooted but not absolute
  on win32; hand-staged dirs need OS-appropriate absolute paths).

- New defensive-coverage tests: _resolve_prebuilt_idedata_paths with
  missing prog_path, no extra section, empty flash_images list.

Issue: esphome/device-builder#572
Issue: esphome/device-builder#570
2026-05-11 13:32:36 -05:00
..
2022-09-06 15:48:01 +12:00
2023-09-12 07:13:24 +12:00

Tests for ESPHome

This directory contains some tests for ESPHome. At the moment, all the tests only work by simply executing esphome over some YAML files that are made to test whether the yaml gets converted to the proper C++ code.

Of course this is all just very high-level and things like unit tests would be much better. So if you have time and know how to set up a unit testing framework for python, please do give it a try.

When adding entries in test_.yaml files we usually need only one file updated, unless conflicting code is generated for different configurations, e.g. wifi and ethernet cannot be tested on the same device.

Current test_.yaml file contents.

Test name Platform Network BLE
test1.yaml ESP32 wifi None
test2.yaml ESP32 ethernet esp32_ble_tracker
test3.yaml ESP8266 wifi N/A
test4.yaml ESP32 ethernet None
test5.yaml ESP32 wifi ble_server
test6.yaml RP2040 wifi N/A
test7.yaml ESP32-C3 wifi N/A
test8.yaml ESP32-S3 wifi None
test10.yaml ESP32 wifi None