diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/number/__init__.py b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/__init__.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b08f67a095
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/__init__.py
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+from tests.testing_helpers import ComponentManifestOverride
+
+
+def override_manifest(manifest: ComponentManifestOverride) -> None:
+    manifest.enable_codegen()
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/number/bench_number.cpp b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/bench_number.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..57a73930b2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/bench_number.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+#include <benchmark/benchmark.h>
+
+#include "esphome/components/number/number.h"
+
+namespace esphome::benchmarks {
+
+// Inner iteration count to amortize CodSpeed instrumentation overhead.
+static constexpr int kInnerIterations = 2000;
+
+// Minimal Number for benchmarking — control() publishes the value back.
+class BenchNumber : public number::Number {
+ public:
+  void configure(const char *name) { this->configure_entity_(name, 0x12345678, 0); }
+
+ protected:
+  void control(float value) override { this->publish_state(value); }
+};
+
+// Helper to create a typical number entity for benchmarks.
+static void setup_number(BenchNumber &number) {
+  number.configure("test_number");
+  number.traits.set_min_value(0.0f);
+  number.traits.set_max_value(100.0f);
+  number.traits.set_step(1.0f);
+  number.traits.set_mode(number::NUMBER_MODE_SLIDER);
+}
+
+// --- Number::publish_state() ---
+// Measures the publish path: set_has_state, store value, callback dispatch.
+
+static void NumberPublish_State(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchNumber number;
+  setup_number(number);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      number.publish_state(static_cast<float>(i % 100));
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(number.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(NumberPublish_State);
+
+// --- Number::publish_state() with callback ---
+// Measures callback dispatch overhead.
+
+static void NumberPublish_WithCallback(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchNumber number;
+  setup_number(number);
+
+  uint64_t callback_count = 0;
+  number.add_on_state_callback([&callback_count](float) { callback_count++; });
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      number.publish_state(static_cast<float>(i % 100));
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(callback_count);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(NumberPublish_WithCallback);
+
+// --- NumberCall::perform() set value ---
+// The most common number call — setting an absolute value.
+// Exercises: validation against min/max, control() dispatch.
+
+static void NumberCall_SetValue(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchNumber number;
+  setup_number(number);
+  number.publish_state(50.0f);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      float val = static_cast<float>(i % 100);
+      number.make_call().set_value(val).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(number.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(NumberCall_SetValue);
+
+// --- NumberCall::perform() increment ---
+// Exercises: state read, step arithmetic, max clamping.
+
+static void NumberCall_Increment(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchNumber number;
+  setup_number(number);
+  number.publish_state(0.0f);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      number.make_call().number_increment(true).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(number.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(NumberCall_Increment);
+
+// --- NumberCall::perform() decrement ---
+// Exercises: state read, step arithmetic, min clamping.
+
+static void NumberCall_Decrement(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchNumber number;
+  setup_number(number);
+  number.publish_state(100.0f);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      number.make_call().number_decrement(true).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(number.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(NumberCall_Decrement);
+
+}  // namespace esphome::benchmarks
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/number/benchmark.yaml b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/benchmark.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..f435661270
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/number/benchmark.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+number:
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/select/__init__.py b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/__init__.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b08f67a095
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/__init__.py
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+from tests.testing_helpers import ComponentManifestOverride
+
+
+def override_manifest(manifest: ComponentManifestOverride) -> None:
+    manifest.enable_codegen()
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/select/bench_select.cpp b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/bench_select.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8e047d9151
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/bench_select.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+#include <benchmark/benchmark.h>
+
+#include "esphome/components/select/select.h"
+
+namespace esphome::benchmarks {
+
+// Inner iteration count to amortize CodSpeed instrumentation overhead.
+static constexpr int kInnerIterations = 2000;
+
+// Minimal Select for benchmarking — control() publishes directly by index.
+class BenchSelect : public select::Select {
+ public:
+  void configure(const char *name) { this->configure_entity_(name, 0x12345678, 0); }
+
+ protected:
+  void control(size_t index) override { this->publish_state(index); }
+};
+
+// Helper to create a select with the given options.
+static void setup_select(BenchSelect &select, const char *name, std::initializer_list<const char *> options) {
+  select.configure(name);
+  select.traits.set_options(options);
+  select.publish_state(size_t(0));
+}
+
+// --- Select::publish_state(size_t) ---
+// The fast path: publish by index, no string lookup.
+
+static void SelectPublish_ByIndex(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.publish_state(static_cast<size_t>(i % 4));
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectPublish_ByIndex);
+
+// --- Select::publish_state(const char *) ---
+// The string path: requires index_of() lookup via strncmp.
+
+static void SelectPublish_ByString(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  const char *options[] = {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"};
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.publish_state(options[i % 4]);
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectPublish_ByString);
+
+// --- Select::publish_state() with callback ---
+// Measures callback dispatch overhead on the index path.
+
+static void SelectPublish_WithCallback(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  uint64_t callback_count = 0;
+  select.add_on_state_callback([&callback_count](size_t) { callback_count++; });
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.publish_state(static_cast<size_t>(i % 4));
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(callback_count);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectPublish_WithCallback);
+
+// --- SelectCall::perform() set by index ---
+// The fast call path — no string matching needed.
+
+static void SelectCall_SetByIndex(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.make_call().set_index(i % 4).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectCall_SetByIndex);
+
+// --- SelectCall::perform() set by option string ---
+// Exercises the string lookup path through index_of().
+
+static void SelectCall_SetByOption(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  const char *options[] = {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"};
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.make_call().set_option(options[i % 4]).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectCall_SetByOption);
+
+// --- SelectCall::perform() next with cycling ---
+// Exercises the navigation path through active_index_.
+
+static void SelectCall_NextCycle(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(select, "test_select", {"off", "still", "move", "still+move"});
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.make_call().select_next(true).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectCall_NextCycle);
+
+// --- SelectCall with 10 options (string lookup) ---
+// Worst-case string matching with more options.
+
+static void SelectCall_SetByOption_10Options(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSelect select;
+  setup_select(
+      select, "test_select",
+      {"off", "still", "move", "still+move", "custom1", "custom2", "custom3", "custom4", "custom5", "custom6"});
+
+  // Pick options spread across the list to exercise different search depths
+  const char *picks[] = {"off", "custom3", "custom6", "move"};
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      select.make_call().set_option(picks[i % 4]).perform();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(select.active_index());
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SelectCall_SetByOption_10Options);
+
+}  // namespace esphome::benchmarks
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/select/benchmark.yaml b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/benchmark.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d336a348a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/select/benchmark.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+select:
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/__init__.py b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/__init__.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b08f67a095
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/__init__.py
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+from tests.testing_helpers import ComponentManifestOverride
+
+
+def override_manifest(manifest: ComponentManifestOverride) -> None:
+    manifest.enable_codegen()
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/bench_switch.cpp b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/bench_switch.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d948f080ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/bench_switch.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+#include <benchmark/benchmark.h>
+
+#include "esphome/components/switch/switch.h"
+
+namespace esphome::benchmarks {
+
+// Inner iteration count to amortize CodSpeed instrumentation overhead.
+static constexpr int kInnerIterations = 2000;
+
+// Minimal Switch for benchmarking — write_state() publishes directly.
+class BenchSwitch : public switch_::Switch {
+ public:
+  void configure(const char *name) { this->configure_entity_(name, 0x12345678, 0); }
+
+ protected:
+  void write_state(bool state) override { this->publish_state(state); }
+};
+
+// --- Switch::publish_state() alternating ---
+// Forces state change every call, exercising the full publish path.
+
+static void SwitchPublish_Alternating(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+  sw.publish_state(false);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.publish_state(i % 2 == 0);
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sw.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchPublish_Alternating);
+
+// --- Switch::publish_state() no change ---
+// Tests the deduplication fast path in publish_dedup_.
+
+static void SwitchPublish_NoChange(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+  sw.publish_state(true);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.publish_state(true);
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sw.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchPublish_NoChange);
+
+// --- Switch::publish_state() with callback ---
+// Measures callback dispatch overhead on state changes.
+
+static void SwitchPublish_WithCallback(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+
+  uint64_t callback_count = 0;
+  sw.add_on_state_callback([&callback_count](bool) { callback_count++; });
+  sw.publish_state(false);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.publish_state(i % 2 == 0);
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(callback_count);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchPublish_WithCallback);
+
+// --- Switch::turn_on() / turn_off() ---
+// The front-end call path: turn_on → write_state → publish_state.
+
+static void SwitchTurnOn(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+  sw.publish_state(false);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.turn_on();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sw.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchTurnOn);
+
+// --- Switch::toggle() alternating ---
+// Exercises the toggle path which reads current state to determine target.
+
+static void SwitchToggle(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+  sw.publish_state(false);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.toggle();
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sw.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchToggle);
+
+// --- Switch::publish_state() inverted ---
+// Verifies the inversion path doesn't add significant overhead.
+
+static void SwitchPublish_Inverted(benchmark::State &state) {
+  BenchSwitch sw;
+  sw.configure("test_switch");
+  sw.set_restore_mode(switch_::SWITCH_ALWAYS_OFF);
+  sw.set_inverted(true);
+  sw.publish_state(false);
+
+  for (auto _ : state) {
+    for (int i = 0; i < kInnerIterations; i++) {
+      sw.publish_state(i % 2 == 0);
+    }
+    benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sw.state);
+  }
+  state.SetItemsProcessed(state.iterations() * kInnerIterations);
+}
+BENCHMARK(SwitchPublish_Inverted);
+
+}  // namespace esphome::benchmarks
diff --git a/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/benchmark.yaml b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/benchmark.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c637b3dc89
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/benchmarks/components/switch/benchmark.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+switch: