[core] Add preference key stability integration test (#18364)

This commit is contained in:
J. Nick Koston
2026-08-13 21:14:30 -05:00
committed by GitHub
parent 990fc402fd
commit b05465145f
3 changed files with 220 additions and 7 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
esphome:
name: host-pref-key-stability
host:
api:
logger:
switch:
- platform: template
id: test_switch_restore
name: Test Switch
optimistic: true
restore_mode: RESTORE_DEFAULT_OFF
number:
- platform: template
id: test_number_restore
name: Test Number
optimistic: true
restore_value: true
initial_value: 1.0
min_value: 0
max_value: 100
step: 0.5
text:
- platform: template
id: test_text_restore
name: Test Text
mode: text
optimistic: true
restore_value: true
initial_value: fallback
min_length: 0
max_length: 20
+17 -7
View File
@@ -25,15 +25,25 @@ def clear_host_prefs(device_name: str) -> None:
host_prefs_path(device_name).unlink(missing_ok=True)
def write_host_prefs(device_name: str, entries: dict[int, bytes]) -> Path:
"""Write preference entries, replacing the file's contents.
Returns the path that was written.
"""
payload = b""
for key, data in entries.items():
if len(data) > 255:
raise ValueError(f"Preference data too long: {len(data)} bytes (max 255)")
payload += struct.pack("<IB", key, len(data)) + data
path = host_prefs_path(device_name)
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
path.write_bytes(payload)
return path
def write_host_pref(device_name: str, key: int, data: bytes) -> Path:
"""Write a single preference entry, replacing the file's contents.
Returns the path that was written.
"""
if len(data) > 255:
raise ValueError(f"Preference data too long: {len(data)} bytes (max 255)")
path = host_prefs_path(device_name)
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
payload = struct.pack("<IB", key, len(data)) + data
path.write_bytes(payload)
return path
return write_host_prefs(device_name, {key: data})
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
"""Integration test for entity preference key stability.
Entity preferences are stored under keys derived from the sanitized object_id
hash. This test seeds the host preferences file the way existing firmware
wrote it and verifies the state is restored, proving the key scheme has not
drifted; a save and reload round trip cannot catch drift because it writes
and reads with the same code.
The second run also seeds the raw-name-hash entries a 2026.8 beta device left
behind (see https://github.com/esphome/esphome/pull/18361) and proves they are
ignored: the object_id entries win and the beta leftovers are inert.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import socket
import struct
from aioesphomeapi import (
NumberInfo,
NumberState,
SwitchInfo,
SwitchState,
TextInfo,
TextState,
)
import pytest
from esphome.helpers import fnv1_hash, fnv1_hash_name, fnv1_hash_object_id
from .conftest import run_binary_and_wait_for_port, wait_and_connect_api_client
from .host_prefs import clear_host_prefs, write_host_prefs
from .state_utils import InitialStateHelper, require_entity
from .types import CompileFunction, ConfigWriter
DEVICE_NAME = "host-pref-key-stability"
# All entities are on the main device (device_id 0) and their preferences use
# no version salt, so the key is just the object_id hash.
SWITCH_KEY = fnv1_hash_object_id("Test Switch")
NUMBER_KEY = fnv1_hash_object_id("Test Number")
# Raw-name-hash keys as written by 2026.8 beta firmware; never read by this build
SWITCH_BETA_KEY = fnv1_hash_name("Test Switch")
NUMBER_BETA_KEY = fnv1_hash_name("Test Number")
# template_text salts its key with the length limits and pattern hash; this must
# match TemplateText::setup() in template_text.cpp (min_length 0, max_length 20,
# no pattern configured)
TEXT_KEY_EXTRA = (0 << 2) + (20 << 4) + (fnv1_hash("") << 6)
TEXT_KEY = (fnv1_hash_object_id("Test Text") + TEXT_KEY_EXTRA) & 0xFFFFFFFF
TEXT_BETA_KEY = (fnv1_hash_name("Test Text") + TEXT_KEY_EXTRA) & 0xFFFFFFFF
# TextSaver<20> stores a length-prefixed buffer of max_length + 1 bytes
TEXT_MAX_LENGTH = 20
def text_pref_payload(value: str) -> bytes:
"""Build the length-prefixed buffer TextSaver stores for a value."""
data = value.encode("utf-8")
assert len(data) <= TEXT_MAX_LENGTH
return bytes([len(data)]) + data + b"\x00" * (TEXT_MAX_LENGTH - len(data))
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_preference_key_stability(
yaml_config: str,
write_yaml_config: ConfigWriter,
compile_esphome: CompileFunction,
reserved_tcp_port: tuple[int, socket.socket],
) -> None:
"""Test that preferences stored by earlier firmware are restored."""
port, port_socket = reserved_tcp_port
assert SWITCH_KEY != SWITCH_BETA_KEY
assert NUMBER_KEY != NUMBER_BETA_KEY
assert TEXT_KEY != TEXT_BETA_KEY
# Write and compile once
config_path = await write_yaml_config(yaml_config)
binary_path = await compile_esphome(config_path)
# Release the reserved port so the binary can bind to it
port_socket.close()
async def boot_and_get_initial_states() -> tuple[
SwitchState, NumberState, TextState
]:
"""Boot the binary and return the restored entity states."""
async with (
run_binary_and_wait_for_port(binary_path, "127.0.0.1", port),
wait_and_connect_api_client(port=port) as client,
):
device_info = await client.device_info()
assert device_info.name == DEVICE_NAME
entities, _ = await client.list_entities_services()
switch_entity = require_entity(
entities, "test_switch", SwitchInfo, "Test Switch"
)
number_entity = require_entity(
entities, "test_number", NumberInfo, "Test Number"
)
text_entity = require_entity(entities, "test_text", TextInfo, "Test Text")
initial_state_helper = InitialStateHelper(entities)
client.subscribe_states(
initial_state_helper.on_state_wrapper(lambda s: None)
)
await initial_state_helper.wait_for_initial_states()
switch_state = initial_state_helper.initial_states[switch_entity.key]
number_state = initial_state_helper.initial_states[number_entity.key]
text_state = initial_state_helper.initial_states[text_entity.key]
assert isinstance(switch_state, SwitchState)
assert isinstance(number_state, NumberState)
assert isinstance(text_state, TextState)
return switch_state, number_state, text_state
try:
# --- Run 1: entries under the object_id-hash keys, exactly as any
# earlier firmware wrote them. The restored states prove the key
# scheme has not drifted.
write_host_prefs(
DEVICE_NAME,
{
SWITCH_KEY: b"\x01", # bool: switch was ON
NUMBER_KEY: struct.pack("<f", 42.5),
TEXT_KEY: text_pref_payload("hello"),
},
)
switch_state, number_state, text_state = await boot_and_get_initial_states()
assert switch_state.state is True, (
"Switch state stored under the object_id preference key was lost"
)
assert number_state.state == 42.5, (
"Number value stored under the object_id preference key was lost"
)
assert text_state.state == "hello", (
"Text value stored under the object_id preference key was lost"
)
# --- Run 2: raw-name-hash entries from a 2026.8 beta device present
# alongside the object_id entries. The object_id data must win; the
# beta entries are never read.
write_host_prefs(
DEVICE_NAME,
{
SWITCH_KEY: b"\x01", # current: ON
SWITCH_BETA_KEY: b"\x00", # beta leftover: OFF
NUMBER_KEY: struct.pack("<f", 13.5), # current
NUMBER_BETA_KEY: struct.pack("<f", 99.5), # beta leftover
TEXT_KEY: text_pref_payload("world"), # current
TEXT_BETA_KEY: text_pref_payload("ignored"), # beta leftover
},
)
switch_state, number_state, text_state = await boot_and_get_initial_states()
assert switch_state.state is True, (
"Beta raw-name-key data overrode the object_id switch state"
)
assert number_state.state == 13.5, (
"Beta raw-name-key data overrode the object_id number value"
)
assert text_state.state == "world", (
"Beta raw-name-key data overrode the object_id text value"
)
finally:
clear_host_prefs(DEVICE_NAME)