Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/dev' into api-encode-pos-by-value

tests/components/atm90e32/__init__.py

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+from tests.testing_helpers import ComponentManifestOverride
+
+
+def override_manifest(manifest: ComponentManifestOverride) -> None:
+    manifest.dependencies = manifest.dependencies + ["sensor", "spi"]

tests/components/atm90e32/offset_register_verification_test.cpp

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+#include "esphome/components/atm90e32/atm90e32.h"
+
+namespace esphome::atm90e32::testing {
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRegisterVerification, AcceptsExactSignedReadback) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(offset_register_value_matches(0x007B, 123));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(offset_register_value_matches(0xFF85, -123));
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRegisterVerification, RejectsMismatchedReadback) {
+  EXPECT_FALSE(offset_register_value_matches(0x007C, 123));
+  EXPECT_FALSE(offset_register_value_matches(0xFF84, -123));
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRestoreState, ReportsVerifiedStoredValuesAsRestored) {
+  const auto state = resolve_offset_restore_state(true, true, false);
+
+  EXPECT_TRUE(state.restored);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(state.values_verified);
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRestoreState, ReportsVerifiedConfigFallbackAsNotRestored) {
+  const auto state = resolve_offset_restore_state(true, false, true);
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(state.restored);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(state.values_verified);
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRestoreState, ReportsFailedConfigFallbackAsUnverified) {
+  const auto state = resolve_offset_restore_state(true, false, false);
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(state.restored);
+  EXPECT_FALSE(state.values_verified);
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetRestoreState, ReportsConfigWithoutStoredValuesAsNotRestored) {
+  const auto state = resolve_offset_restore_state(false, true, false);
+
+  EXPECT_FALSE(state.restored);
+  EXPECT_TRUE(state.values_verified);
+}
+
+TEST(ATM90E32OffsetPersistence, RollsBackStoredValuesOrZeroSentinel) {
+  const OffsetCalibration previous[3]{{1, -1}, {2, -2}, {3, -3}};
+  OffsetCalibration rollback[3]{};
+
+  prepare_offset_rollback(previous, true, rollback);
+  for (uint8_t phase = 0; phase < 3; phase++) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(rollback[phase].first_offset, previous[phase].first_offset);
+    EXPECT_EQ(rollback[phase].second_offset, previous[phase].second_offset);
+  }
+
+  prepare_offset_rollback(previous, false, rollback);
+  for (const auto &phase : rollback) {
+    EXPECT_EQ(phase.first_offset, 0);
+    EXPECT_EQ(phase.second_offset, 0);
+  }
+}
+
+}  // namespace esphome::atm90e32::testing

tests/components/sendspin/common-hub.yaml

@@ -4,3 +4,6 @@ psram:
 sendspin:
   id: sendspin_hub_id
   task_stack_in_psram: true
+  manufacturer: Test Manufacturer
+  model: Test Model
+  firmware_version: 1.2.3

tests/components/serial_proxy/test-tap.esp32-idf.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+substitutions:
+  tx_pin: GPIO4
+  rx_pin: GPIO5
+
+# Compile the tap code paths; no tap is attached, so this exercises the
+# null-tap branches that a normal build never defines.
+esphome:
+  platformio_options:
+    build_flags:
+      - "-DUSE_SERIAL_PROXY_TAP"
+
+packages:
+  uart: !include ../../test_build_components/common/uart/esp32-idf.yaml
+  serial_proxy: !include common.yaml

tests/components/tuya/test-no-network.bk72xx-ard.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# Tuya without any network component (no wifi/ethernet/api), as used on
+# serial-only or BLE-only Tuya MCU boards. Regression test for
+# https://github.com/esphome/esphome/issues/18942
+substitutions:
+  status_pin: P6
+
+packages:
+  uart: !include ../../test_build_components/common/uart/bk72xx-ard.yaml
+
+tuya:
+  status_pin: ${status_pin}
+
+binary_sensor:
+  - platform: tuya
+    id: tuya_presence
+    sensor_datapoint: 101
+
+sensor:
+  - platform: tuya
+    id: tuya_light_intensity
+    sensor_datapoint: 103
+
+number:
+  - platform: tuya
+    id: tuya_far_detection
+    number_datapoint: 109
+    min_value: 0
+    max_value: 600
+    step: 1